The robo-signing scandal that engulfed mortgage servicers during the foreclosure crisis had a lesser-known parallel in debt collection: mass production of affidavits, assignments, and account statements by people who never reviewed them, signed by “authorized signers” who had no firsthand knowledge of the accounts. In California courts, this documentation problem is a live defense.
What Robo-Signing Looks Like in Debt Cases
Debt collection robo-signing involves: affidavits of debt signed by low-level employees who never reviewed the actual account, chain of title assignments executed en masse without individual review, account statements generated from databases that may contain errors, and “business records” affidavits that don’t actually meet the business records exception to hearsay rules.
How to Challenge Documentation in Court
If a debt buyer sues you, challenge the foundation of every document they submit. In California small claims and limited civil cases, you can demand that the person who signed each affidavit appear in person to testify. An affidavit signer who cannot answer basic questions about how the account records are maintained destroys the business records foundation required to admit those records into evidence.
The Pre-Lawsuit Demand
Before you are ever sued, your debt validation demand letter should specifically request the original signed credit agreement, the complete chain of assignment with each individual assignment document, and an affidavit from someone with personal knowledge of your specific account — not a form affidavit. This demand surfaces documentation problems early.
Why Collectors Dismiss Cases
Faced with a defendant who has demanded proper documentation and challenged the foundation of their records, collectors frequently dismiss cases rather than risk a judgment that exposes their documentation practices. The Justice Foundation kit includes the specific validation demand language that triggers these responses.
Leave a Reply